By Dr. Yitzhak Hayut-Man and Tirtsah Arzi
Parashat
va’Yetse (Gen. 28:10 – 32:3)
Introduction
Part 1 – Jacob’s exit
from Kena’an, and the 1st Stone: Bet-El.
Preparation for building the Temple in Parashat “va’Yetse”
The
Promise to Build the House of God
The
Dream Ladder and the Stone
Ya’aqov,
Yishma’el and Mohammed
Part II –
Ya’aqov in Haran, and the Moving of the Stone off the Well
The meeting with Rahel by the Mouth of the Well.
The Contention of Le’ah and Rahel
The Case of the Mandrakes in the field
Motherhood-Games and Leadership-Struggles in
Israel.
The Names of the Tribes and the Structure of their
Covenant
The Twelve Tribes as ordered in Ya’aqov’s Ladder and
the Circle
The Tribes and their Meaning for the Future
The Spiritual Moves of Ya’aqov between Le’ah and
Rahel
The Negotiations of Ya’aqov and Lavan.
Part 3 – The Flight from Lavan’s House and the Erection of Stone
Monument at the Gil’ad.
The
theft of the Idolons-Teraphim
The Rectification of Ya’aqov, Le’ah and Rahel – and now
of Yisra’el.
Attitude
of the Prophet towards Ya’aqov
Appendices (not included yet)
“A”: The
Relationship of Ya’aqov Le’ah and Rahel according to the Etz Hayim.
“B”: The
Tribes According to the Zoher:
1.
The Zoher for vaYetse,
about the Tribes.
2.
The Zoher for vaYetse,
chapter “When Rahel bore Yoseph”.
3.
The Zohar for Mishpatim,
the Sava deMishpatim on the Children of Israel.
“Va’Yetse Ya’aqov”
(And Jacob went out): In this parashah we shall follow Ya’aqov-Jacob:
what did he go out of, and what did he go out for, what did he follow (aqav,
connected with the name Ya’aqov) and where did he arrive, how did
the vision which he had when he left Kena’an towards Haran come
out (yatsa), and how did there come out (yats’ah)
of the vision “the whole stature” (Qomah Shlemah) of Israel-Yisra’el,
and how did Ya’aqov finally “exited (yatsa) with a great fortune
from his adventures in Haran.
The whole
historical-archetypal course described in the Book of Genesis is like a ladder
– “Lacob’s Ladder” (Sulam Ya’aqov) – that leads from Parashat Bereshit
to Parashat va’Yehi (“He would live”). The Book of Genesis
is composed of the tales of realistic living people who form this ladder, and
in this process the book also deals with the basic instincts and emotions of
the protagonists; but Parashat va’Yetse is loaded more than the
other parashot with exteriorised emotions that are given outlet: a tale
of love and of suffering, a tale that comences with brothers’ struggle and ends
with sisters’ struggle, a tale of emotions that become realized through
fertility and births, leading to the birth of twelve fraternal tribes. This
multiplicity and mellowing of emotions is integral to the place of this parashah
within the historical-archetypal course described in the Book of Genesis. In
the course of his exiting, through his noting his movements between his two
sister-wives, Ya’aqov would become aware of his own special place in the ladder
of the Tree of the Sefirot, the Sefirah of Tif’eret (Glory-Beauty-Compassion),
through which he would tie in the assembly – the Merkavah – of
the patriarchs.
In this parashah,
we also learn about the wrestling of the matriarchs, the Mothers of the nation
of Israel, which are significant also for the formation of the future Israel in
our times. In the narrative of this parashah, we also learn about the
formation of eleven of the twelve brothers who would constitute Yisrael-Israel,
about the relationships of the mistress and the bondwoman as wives of the patriarchs
of the nation, and about the end of “the hereditary barrenness” of the children
of Abraham.
Moreover, in this parashah
we learn about the birth of Joseph-Yoseph, the only son of
the beloved wife, the beloved of his father, much as Esav was the beloved of
his father Yitzhaq. From this opens, in the next parashot and in
their continuation in history since then, the way for the great Tikkun
(restitution) of Jacob-Ya’aqov and Esau-Esav
through the acts of Joseph and his brothers.
Va’Yetse Ya’aqov – And Jacob would exit
The exit of Ya’aqov from
Kena’an-Canaan prepares for the other exit, the final one, of the
family of Abraham from Haran. Only the exit-exodus of
Ya’aqov from Haran, with his wives and children, completes the command
to Abraham “Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred and from thy
father’s house”.
Ya’aqov’s exit from Haran
also fashions and prepares for the great exit of the Children of Israel, namely
the Exodus from Egypt, “to the land that I shall show thee”. What was
true for Ya’aqov and his sons would become also true for the last of the mixed
multitudes that join the Children of Israel on their exodus from Egypt and from
“the desert of the nations”.
In the course of the parashah,
Ya’aqov exits twice in an escape, in hiding. In the beginning of the parasha
he exits his parents house in the Land of Kena’an, away from his brother
who plotted to kill him; and in its end he escapes from Haran, from the
house of his uncle Lavan, and with him most of the property of Lavan:
his herds, his daughters, his grandchildren, and even his gods.
In contrast with the
servant, who exited one generation earlier for a betrothal visit at the family
of Lavan, equipped with the most precious jewels and presents,
Ya’aqov – who had just been blessed with all the riches of the earth – arrived
at Haran withoput anything. His course would thus be far more difficult
than that of the servant. He would have to buy his wife through hard labor,
which would prepare him, in turn, to become “Yisra’el”, one who
can “contend with gods and men”, facing them and not hiding. Indeed, the
adventures that lie in store for him in his exits were destined to change his
living, his character, and his outlook.
Even when Ya’aqov did
not exit – physically – from one place to another, he exited from his
established manner: the spoiled brat, the tent dweller of his mother Rivqah,
would become in the course of the parashah into a mighty man, a kind of
Esav incarnated in Ya’aqov: he would roll with his own hand a stone that all
the shepherds of Haran were needed for removing it, he would work acts
of magic in order to increase the spotted lambs in his herds, and mostly he
would work as a dedicated laborer, day and night. The spoiled “dweller of
tents” would willingly become a slave for twenty years, until there would grow
of him a dependable and conscious man.
“Ya’aqov” was a mean
person who cheated and schemed (aqav, related to Ya’aqov
– the one who would scheme), as evidenced by the ignominious acts in his youth;
or – in a different meaning of his name – a simple man with no personal
initiative, who followed (aqav) because of (eqev)
whatever happened around him. But it was Ya’aqov whom the Bible credits with
seeking – for the first time in the history of the House of Abraham – to build
the House of God. His ambitions were celestial, but in his conduct, he was
earthly, and quite a few times quite mean.
The simple boy became a
tough adult. This is the story of the personal Tikkun of Ya’aqov,
which is completed when he contended with the angel, held his own heroically,
and gained a new name “Yisra’el”. Becoming Yisra’el
entails personal valor, but also a universal vocation, which would be realized
only through his sons. Ya’aqov is a private person. Yisra’el is the Father of
the Twelve Tribes, who realizes the divine plan of founding “a Chosen People”
made of twelve tribes, an idea already inherent in the primordial scheme of Bereshit.
Ya’aqov had an earthly
family, Yisra’el – a divine family, which had to carry on its
shoulders the mission of the Universal Man.
The saying va’Yetse
(in the inverted future tense, as explained in the introduction) has to
do with this future Israel-Yisra’el, through which the archetypal
idea of Yisra’el would come out – yetse – from
potential to actual, and eventually will issue – yets’u – twelve
sons to the family of Yitzhaq.
In summary: the whole course of Creation-Beri’ah
is an exiting (the word Bri’ah has to do
with exiting to the bar – to the outside). Parashat va’Yetse
deals with the exit from the hidden Olam haBa (“The World to
Come”, corresponding to the Worlds of Atsilut and of Beri’ah,
see chapter 1), and into Olam haZe (“This World”, corresponding
to the Worlds of Yetsirah and of Assiyah-Action),
which is an observable and sensed, and even demonstrates this exit through an
authentic and emotional human story.
Part 1 – Jacob’s exit
from Kena’an, and the 1st Stone: Bet-El.
“And Ya’aqov exited
from Be’er Sheva”
Ya’aqov exited for Haran with the blessing of his
father and mother, and especially with the harsh encouragement of his brother
Esav.
In his commentary (for
29:11), Rashi supplies a reason that Ya’aqov arrived to Haran with no
provisions: Esav sent his son Eliphaz to kill Ya’aqov, and the son robbed
Ya’aqov and left him in the state of “a poor man is as good as dead”. This
Midrash is in the spirit of the story that we shall still read about Joseph-Yoseph
and his brothers. Esav took measures, whether intentionally or not, that his
younger brother would have to fight over his image and his status, to exile
from his land in poverty and to succeed in the land of exile even more that
Esav would.
“And he went toward Haran”
The ARI’zl (Rabbi Yitzhaq
Luria, the most important master of Kabbalah) compares in this context
Haran to Garon (throat), a narrow place where the
voice gets cramped (“and the voice is Ya’aqov’s voice”). In the following, we
shall see clearly that Ya’aqov was indeed pushed there and was subjected there
to hard labor. The direction of Ya’aqov’s journey was Northward, to the
side connected in the Kabbalah with the quality of Din – harsh
Judgment. We may note that the Hebrew word Tsafon (North) is
connected with the concept of Matspun – conscience (probably
because the North, or polar, star gives a constant and safe direction for the
journey, and conscience allows navigation in the fuzzy world of social values).
Ya’aqov who exited Kena’an still lacked conscience, whereas the mature Ya’aqov
returned from Haran with a developed conscience within him.
“va’Yifga ba’Maqom
– and he lighted upon a certain Place
The term Maqom
for “Place” was mentioned already before, in the story of the Aqedah:
“and he went to the Maqom” (22:3), “and he saw the Maqom
far away” (22:4). According to Rashi, the Blessed Holy One “is the Maqom-place
of the World, and the World is not His Maqom-place” (his
commentary to Exodus 33:21). The blessed and mind-expanding influence of the
Infinite, which is normally enveloping but not sensed, appears as a Maqom,
as a distinct locus, and receives through it a form. HaMaqom is
any location where the divine power appears upon earth and manifests in
remarkable forms. This is the Power, because of which Ya’aqov, who was
awakening from his sleep, said, “how dreadful is this place” (28:17). Ya’aqov
went to sleep with certain doubts about himself and was very worried about what
may befall him. The epiphany of the Lord in his dream gave him trust in his
future, but filled him with awe and dread, from his observation how immense is
the divine world.
So, what was this Maqom-place
in geographic terms? Could it have been the same Maqom toward
which had Abraham been sent? According to the traditional commentators –
definitely yes. The commentators were ready even to bend the earth for this
purpose: “I say that Mount Moriah was pulled out and came here, and this is
“the Land Jump” (Ramban’s commentary for parashat va’Yetse ch.
28). According to Rashi, who brings the version of Rabbi Eliezer who quoted
Rabbi Yossei ben Zimra: “that ladder stands at Be’er Sheva (from whence Ya’aqov
departed), and its incline reaches till the Temple”, or – in another version –
“there is a ladder with its feet at Be’er Sheva and its top at Bet-El and its
incline reaches towards Jerusalem” (Rashi for 28:17). The problem of the commentators
was to connect between the location of Bet-El - which we know as a town in the
domain of Benjamin, where the main road from Be’er Sheva to Haran indeed
passed through – and the Maqom-place at Mount Moriah, the place
of the Aqedah, and eventually the site of the Temple. We shall treat the
ladder of Ya’aqov’s dream as a
multi-dimensional axis, which connects different worlds, not all of them
material. The two-dimensional projection of the ladder upon the surface of the
earth forms a kind of meta-physical geography.
What is found at the top
of the ladder is actually “The Heavenly Temple” (Bet haMikdash shel
Ma’alah), which connects with all those locations with a sacred
potential (including Be’er Sheva, Hebron, Bet-Lehem, Mount Moriah,
Beit-El and Dan). From this perspective, Bet El and Mount Moriah are similar –
in the dimension of the sacred, and the building of the Temple establishes
their mutual connections. If we regard it this way – “and he saw the Maqom”,
“and he lighted on the Maqom”, and even “and he took the stones
of that Maqom”, do not refer just to the physical location, but
to the creator of all space – for the word Maqom is also used as
a synonym to the Blessed Holy One.
“And he took of the
stones of that place-Maqom, and put them under his head”
Ya’aqov’s connection
with that cosmic axis was effected through the stone that he put under his
head. It is thus for a reason that the commentators had dwelled much upon that
stone. The best known of these midrashim is the one about the stones that
quarreled between them, which of them would serve as a pillow for that virtuous
man, until a miracle happened, and they all became one stone. Another, less
known, midrash, given by the Ramban, that Ya’aqov picked up,
unknowingly, the twelve stones of the altar that Abraham built for the Aqedah.
In any case, the stone is regarded in the Kabbalah as a feminine element, and
the ARI’zl sees in it the Yesod (the Foundation, and symbol for
the genitals) of Le’ah (his future wife), symbol for the Heavenly
Binah-Understanding. This understanding of the stone gives a hint
about following events on Ya’aqov’s journey: in the morning the stone receives
a masculine element, when Ya’aqov erects it as a standing stone monument
turning to heaven, and when he arrived at Haran, he rolled the stone
(feminine again) from over the well, and opened a venue for his relationship to
his future wives.
The (Book of the) Zohar
characteristically, goes further in its midrash, as follows:
“And he took
from the stones of the Maqom-place: it is not written avne
haMaqom (stones of the place) but “me’avne haMaqom” (from
the stones of the Maqom), these are precious stones, which are
Twelve Superior Stones, as it is written shteym esre Avanim (“Twelve
Stones” – Joshu’a 4:3). And under them are twelve thousand hewn ones, and all
of them are called “stones” (avanim). Therefore it was said “from the
stones of the Maqom-place”, and not “the stones of the Maqom-place”,
this is the very Maqom we referred to.
“And he put
under his head”: whose head? But the head of whom who is called Maqom, (so)
what does it mean ‘mra’ashotav’? If you say (this means) like
someone who puts something under his head, this is not so, but ‘mra’ashotav’
(literally, “His Headings”) (mean) the four cardinal directions of the world,
three stones to the Northern side, three to the Western side, three to the
South side, and three to the East side, and that Maqom stands
over them to be dressed-decorated (or restored) by them”.
What is implied by this
is that Ya’aqov built a whole stylized setting of a circle of twelve stones and
another stone at the center. In his Sulam (“ladder”) commentary to the Zohar,
Rabbi Y.L. Ashlag recalls in the context of these twelve stones the ‘Sea of
Brass’ that stood at the Temple of Solomon-Shlomoh, carried over twelve
brazen bulls. In our days, the antiquities researcher John Michell has
re-discovered “The New Jerusalem Diagram”, which was apparently used for
delineating ancient temples around the world, including the Great Pyramid and
the megalith temple of the stone circles at Stonehenge, England (see appendix
at parashat Lekh-Lekha). In this pattern, the circle is divided
into 28 equal sections, in which are marked places for 12 circles arranged in
four triplets.
In any case, it is in parashat
va’Yetse that the expression Bet Elohim – “the House
of God” – is first mentioned. This is the preparation for the main subject of
the Book of Exodus-Shemot – the building of the Tebernacle-Mishkan
(whose aim is “and let them make me a sanctuary, that I may dwell – veshakhanti
– among them” Exodus 25:8). There is a primary condition about building the
tabernacle – it being surrounded by the twelve tribes. This becomes evident
from the detailing of the Tabernacle in the Book of Exodus, and elaborated in
the prophet Ezekiel’s vision about the future Temple (Ezekiel 48), where the
Temple precinct is connected with the rest of the country via twelve gates, a
gate for each one of the tribes of Israel.
After the delineation of
the pattern, including marking the twelve camps in the circle around him,
Ya’aqov went out – yatsa – to Haran to realize, still in
his own lifetime, the principle of the Twelve.
“And he dreamed”
Twice in the course of
this parashah, Ya’aqov dreamt a significant dream. The better-known
“Jacob’s Dream”, which many painters and artists treated – a ladder with angels
ascending and descending – is indeed one of the most picturesque and
better-known passages in the scriptures. But to the extent that the theory we
posited here is true, and the earthly Ya’aqov, the schemer, progresses through
his years in Haran and his life journey towards transforming himself
into the model “Yisra’el”, then this dream perhaps should have
come at a later stage, whereas the second dream – about how to increase the
herd of the spotted sheep – ostensibly belongs to the old, earthly scheming
Ya’aqov.
We shall still deal with
this paradox and its solution.
In any case, the
significance of the first dream is in locating the place. “And he lighted upon haMaqom
and slept there” is written with intention.
“And behold a ladder
set up on earth, and the top of it reached to heaven”
The ladder connects
heaven and earth, which were separated through the utterances of Bereshit:
“Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it divide water
from water” (1:6), as well as “Let the water under the heaven be gathered
together to one place-Maqom, and let the land appear” (1:9); as it
connects between the different events of Genesis – from the Creation (Beri’ah-Exit)
to these exits of Ya’aqov, to the Exodus from Egypt and the building of the
Tabernacle.
Ya’aqov’s ladder is
supported by two pillars, right and left (which parallel his fathers, Abraham
and Yitzhaq, as well as to the Yakhin and Bo’az pillars in Solomon’s
Temple, which apparently symbolize the pillars of the cosmic ladder), and the
risers between the pillars form “The Middle Pillar” of “The Tree of Life” of
the divine Sefirot, which is the pattern for forming the soul. From this
Middle Pillar, which is also “The Middle Bar” (Bari’ah haTikhon)
– which may “reach from end to end”, as described about the building of the
Tabernacle (Exodus 26:28) – Ya’aqov could
watch up and up, beyond all the heavens, as well as downwards – beyond the
deepest She’ol (hell), and even (as we shall see in the
following) to primordial worlds that had disappeared long ago and left no
apparent trace.
Over the generations,
the image of the ladder served to build various philosophical and religious
systems for describing the cosmos and the relationship of the divine and the
human within that cosmos. We may recall the ecstatic contemplation methods of
the Church Fathers, such as Johan Calimacos (namely “the Ladder Man”) of Sinai,
who gave inspiration for Sören Kirkegård to build a system of Existentialist
Philosophy. Another philosopher, Ludwig Wittgenstein, likened his system in
“The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus” to a six rung ladder[1]. Whoever
reaches up, to the seventh level, may leave the ladder and enter the abode of
Sophia.
Also in the systems of the Kabbalah there are drawn many
Jacob’s ladders, level upon level, stage upon stage, in systems of Sefirot
and of Partsufim (configurations), that are arrayed upon the
primordial matrix (a visual image of it may be found within the Dome of the
Rock at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem), in order to generate the redemptive
acts of restoration-Tikkun and healing of man – the practical (Assiyah),
emotional (Yetsirah) and the intellectual (Beri’ah)
– as of five main levels denoted by the four letters of the tetragramaton of
YHWH together with the tip of (Kutso shel) the letter Yod.
“and behold the angel of God-Elohim ascending and
descending on it”
The descriptions of
angels in the Bible have led to the development of whole “Angelologies”, Jewish
and Christian, and which are important motif in religious art. Ya’aqov’s ladder
is perhaps the most fertile of them.
What did Ya’aqov see in
his dream? E saw himself in the Divine world, which is full of angels. Of all
the patriarchs, Ya’aqov is the beloved of the angels. Yishma’el was saved by an
angel, and so was Yitzhaq, but they needed the angels at a critical
moment in a dangerous situation. Ya’aqov is gong to be accompanied by angels
often, along his various journeys, and they would even become his own
messengers.
The angels of that dream
vision did not fly with their wings, as angels appear in the collective
artistic images, but they needed a ladder. Moreover: the angels – at least
according to the concept of the Kabbalah – have no freedom of movement. The
prophet Isaiah (6:2) described the angels
as “Seraphim standing above him”, and Zekhariah (Zechariah) promised
Yehoshu’a the High Priest “I will give you movements (mahalakhim)
among these who stand by” (3:7). That is,
the angels stand, as they have no ability t change. Only man has movements-mahalakhim
among them, only man can change, to experience both the higher and the lower
worlds. That is, the ladder is actually man. It is man who connects between the
divine and the mundane worlds. Ya’aqov, dreaming about the ladder, was actually
seeing himself as the Cosmic Man. For each one of the angels in the ladder
there is a given place and definite task. The Seraphim described by Isaiah have
– in spite of their being standing – “each one had six wings”. The wings are
steering-wings, for navigating in the spaces of spiritual worlds, in which
there operate the six spiritual measures: Hesed-Love; Din-Judgment;
Rahamim-Compassion; Netsah-winning; Hod-yielding;
and Yesod-thoroughness.
“and behold a ladder…
And behold, the Lord-YHWH stood above it”
The simple image is of a
kind of ladder, something like a household ladder, above which there is
something that represents the divine in Being (HaWaYaH), such as
the letters Y.H.W.H. in their being and pronunciation. But the gist of
it is that the name of YHWH also fashions the steps of the
enchanted ladder from its own Being. This is a ladder of letters, that each of
its risers is built from a Name of Being, and surely contains a fractal
structure, where the name of YHWH is bubbling throughout it, at
any scale.
Not only
angels ascended and descended the ladder, claims the Kabbalah, but also the
virtuous persons (Tsadiqim) may climb it, as is written “The name
of the Lord-YHWH is a strong tower; the righteous runs in it” (Proverbs
18:10). Supported by this verse, the Mekubalimof
all generations often tried to utilize the names of YHWH in order
to reach the needed merit to ascend and descend Ya’aqov’s ladder.
Since the flowering of
the Kabbalah in Safed, it is customary to characterize the different
manifestations of the Name of YHWH by gematrica values that
derive from the “fillings” (Miluy): One stage (the higher one) of
the ladder was probably that of 72 (AV) with the Miluy
of Yod Hy Wyw Hy – another is of 63 (SaG) with Miluy
of Yod Hy Waw Hy – of 52 (BeN) with Miluy
of Yod Hh Ww Hh – and of 45 (MaH) with Miluy
of Yod He Waw He.
“And said, I Am the
Lord-YHWH God of Avraham thy father, and the God of Yitzhaq; the Eretz-earth
on which thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed, and thy seed
shall be as the dust of the earth…”
These words of the Lord
describe the spiritual structure of the ladder. The ladder is Man, whom the
Lord stands over. The saying “God of Avraham thy father” and not “God of Yitzhaq
thy father” (as would be genealogically correct), shows the status f Ya’aqov
himself within this ladder, as a derivation of Abraham – the side of Hesed-Mercy
– and as equal (or superior) to his biological father Yitzhaq – the side
of Din-Judgment. YHWH is above him, because He is
the God of his both his fathers, Abraham and Yitzhaq. There very
different grasp of the Lord are situated at his two sides, right and left, as
the pillars of the ladder, and allow him to build the risers between them, for
the righteous to run by, as was shown above “The name of the Lord YHWH
is a strong tower; the righteous runs in it” (Proverbs 18:10).
Yet, what makes this
assembly into a ladder (and not just a flying “Chariot”) is its connection with
“the earth on which thou liest”.
What makes the event so
real and a meaningful memory is that Ya’aqov is connected to the earth and
joined to her[2]. The erotic rendering of Ya’aqov’s connection to the
earth at that place-Maqom testifies to his psychological
attitude. The event happened when he was about to exit and leave the land,
perhaps for ever, and his relationship to her must have been accompanied
with much nostalgia. This connection was amplified by the ritualized
preparation of the place for sleep and for dreaming, by placing the stones in
the special order.
The divine epiphany
continued with the same thematic association of earth rituals, Ya’aqov was
lying on (with) the earth, and immediately his seed was mentioned, and this seed
was immediately equated with the dust of the earth.
Preparation for building the Temple in Parashat “va’Yetse”
Upon his exiting the land, Ya’aqov observed in his
vision “the house of God and.. the gate of heaven” (28:17). Why did Ya’aqov receive this vision and not his
fathers? Had Ya’aqov stayed in the land, it would have been difficult for him
to live his daily life in a land that belonged to the peoples of Kena’an-Canaan,
and act to realize the Temple in his life. He would have either yielded and
turn himself into a “Canaanite”, or would have become a suicidal zealot, of the
type that Shim’on and Levi eventually turned out. Ya’aqov adopted the typical
Jewish solution, which would return many times since. His journey to Haran
is a means to procure the means to realize the vision of building the House of
God. On the other hand, the luxuries of the exile might certainly banish the
old dream from his mind, and the role of Laban was to make him remember.
In the Book of Exodus we shall encounter the basic
pattern of the Tabernacle. The planning principle is to provide a sacred
center, common for twelve brothers-tribes who are likely to be feuding among
them, a place for conferring (hitva’adut) and for confessing (hitvadut)
for the expiation of their sins. The fact that the dream about the House of God
at the Land of Israel was the dream of their father Ya’aqov, would enable the
Temple to be common to all “The Children of Israel”.
In the same parashah in which we read about the
vision of Ya’aqov’s ladder, we also read about abundant fertility: four wives,
eleven sons and one daughter, and thousands of sheep and goats, and this is not
yet all. The great fertility in the exile, which is the beginning of the Bok of
Exodus, is already found at Ya’aqov’s exile at parashat va’Yetse.
“And thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to
the east, and to the north, and to the south”
The ritual actions noted above, the placing of the
stones around the locus of the epiphany ritual according to the four cardinal directions,
result in that the blessing would spread from the Maqom to the
four “ends of the earth”.
“And Ya’aqov rose up early in the morning” (28:18)
We have already found this mode of getting up with
Abraham, when he sent Hagar and Ishmael away from his house, and on his exit
towards the Aqedah. Also Bil’am rose up early in the morning in
order to curse Israel (Numbers 22:21).
Abraham rose up early to attend to controversial matters, Ya’aqov rose up to
perform cultic-magical ritual building of erecting a standing stone.
“and took the stone that he had put under his head,
and set it up for a pillar, and poured oil on the top of it”
Such an erection of a megalith is well known from
archeological research. A tall megalith, placed erect, against the earth’s
gravity, the top of which was libated with oil, or blood of sacrifice, is
recognized as a primordial form of building a temple. These were temples that
indicate great potencies of hidden terrestrial energies, which may arouse the
imaginative faculties of people. The stone thus became a mark for the Maqom,
but Ya’aqov was not satisfied with the spontaneous primary temple. He made a
vow and stipulated conditions to the Lord “If God will be with me, and will
keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat… so I come back to
my father’s house in peace, then” he promised “the Lord-YHWH
shall be my God; and this stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God’s
house; and of all that thou shalt give me I will surely give the tenth to thee”
(28:20-22).
The Promise to Build
the House of God
The possibility of building “the House of God” – BeT
Elohim, is already cded into the first words of Genesis “Be(reshi)T
(bara) Elohim. This is the very object of the Acts of Creation:
“from the first day that the Holy One created the world he craved… to dwell
with his creatures in the lower worlds” (Bamidbar Raba, parashah 13). The hidden motif of the Book of Genesis is the
building of the Temple, and the stone that Ya’aqov erected at Luz, is itself a Luz,
the upper vertebra of the spin, to which the Midrashim assign a major
function: “From whence will the Holy One erect Man at the Time to Come? From
the Luz of the spin” (Bereshit Raba 28). This is the small bone that never gets lost and
serves as the seed for the rebuilding of the body at the resurrection of the
dead, and from there Ya’aqov promised to build the House of God, by his hands,
or the hands of his twelve sons.
The scripture goes three times to remind that that Maqom-place
was called by Ya’aqov Bet-El, “but the name of the city was called Luz at
first” (Gen. 28:19; 35:6; Judges 1:23),
which clearly indicates the importance of this information. According to the
legends of the sages, Luz was the city of the immortals. In many traditions,
the city of the immortals is adjacent to the cosmic axis that connects heaven
and earth. Thus, for example, in central Asia are traditions about the hidden
city of the enlightened ones, Shambhalla or Agharta, close to Mount Meru, which
is the mountain that connects heaven and earth. Luz is thus a city of eternity,
but then also “The Eternity-Netsah is Jerusalem, and the Hod
is the Temple (Bavly, Berakhot 58a).
Abraham and Yitzhaq, in their encounters with
God, built ad-hoc altars. Ya’aqov made new terms, more durable: a stone pillar
that will stand as a sign, and more than that: a “House of God”.
“And this stone, which I have set for a pillar,
shall be God’s house”
When ya’aqov went to sleep, the stone was lying upon
the earth under his head, and thus allowed his head to turn upwards, as he was
dreaming about a ladder connecting heaven and earth. After he got up, deeply
moved, he erected the stone vertically, which is not natural for stones and for
most animals, but is in the image of the erect Adam (“Homo Erectus”), where the
name for Adam is also from Adame le’Elyon (I shall resemble the
High One”), and Adam-human is also “a small Temple”.
In the dedication of the stone to mark the future
Temple there is also a sign for our times: the relocation of the Temple Axis,
and of the Temple pattern that is in the Image of Man, from a horizontal to a
vertical axis. It points that the future temple will be erect as a ladder and
would connect the earthly Jerusalem with the Heavenly Temple.
This ritual
action, in fact the founding of the Temple, should have been performed in pride
and joy, But Ya’aqov did it in fear and trembling: “And he was afraid, and
said, How awesome is this place! This is no other but the house of God, and
this is the gate of heaven" (28:17). Also the words of the vow that Ya’aqov vowed there
disclose his state at that moment. He was still full of fears and worries, and
did not trust himself to be able to overcome the practical difficulties: “If
God will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me
bread to eat, and garment to put on, so that I come back to my father's house
in peace”. For up to then he was a spoilt child who dwells in his mother’s
tent.
Yet soon
enough he had the opportunity for the first proof that he was capable of taking
care of himself and for others, through a miracle that was connected with
another stone.
The Dream Ladder and the Stone
Ya’aqov
arrived at Luz already charged with the dream of “Yisrael”, which
was authored by his grandmother, Sara the Matriarch. The dream was destined to
become realized specifically at the Land of Israel. The dream that Ya’aqov
himself dreamt, at his last touch with the soil of his motherland, was the
dream of the ladder that rises to heaven through the Land of Israel, which is the
navel of the earth.
Why was it
specifically “Ya’aqov” who merited the dream of the ladder, and why did he
merit to have it called after him? Because the ladder was the self-portrait,
personal and general-human, of Ya’aqov. Above is situated his higher-self – who
is called Yisra’el-Israel – situated in the midst of the ladder
is the concept of “Yeshurun”, whom we still do not know at this
stage, and the base of the ladder, which is placed upon the earth like a heal (Aqev),
is "Ya’aqov”.
The stone
symbolizes the actualization of the ladder through a physical facility – the
future Temple. The erection of the standing stone is an obligation of Ya’aqov
and his seed to build it. Therefore, Ya’aqov said “this is no other than the
House of God, and this is the gate of heaven”, and then erected with his own
hands the monument stone as a witness to it.
Ya’aqov, Yishma’el and Mohammed
Before we
examine Ya’aqov’s sojourn in Haran, we should perhaps pay attention to
the parallels between the exit of Ya’aqov from the land to Haran, to the
sending away of Yishma’el on one hand, and the Hejira – the migration of the
prophet of the Children of Yisma’el from Mecca – on the other hand.
Yishma’el was
sent from Abraham’s house at the command of Sara, who worried that he may
endanger her son Yitzhaq, whereas Ya’aqov was sent from the house of
Yitzhaq to Haran at the behest of his mother Rivqah, who was
afraid that his older brother would kill him. There is thus much similarity
between the stories, but also difference, and this difference is accompanied by
differences in their life stories in the following. Yishmael had to fend for
himself completely, whereas Ya’aqov enjoyed the family hospitality of Laban
(see below) that did cost him dearly, but brought him eventually a big family
and much property. Yishmael returned to Canaan a few decades later, but only
for a visit, to participate in the burial of Abraham, when he was already well
established, and father of twelve sons that were destined for greatness,
whereas Ya’aqov would return after twenty years, also well established, with
much property and twelve sons, but in order to settle in the land. It is
written, “And Ya’aqov dwelt in the land in which his father had sojourned” (37:1). As we already noted, and will also see in the
following, this sojourn of Ya’aqov was important for his maturation.
Mohammed, the
prophet of Islam, apparently attained prophecy through an experience of a
heavenly ascent (via Jerusalem) through steps (Al-Mi’araj) that recall
somewhat the ladder vision of Ya’aqov. Also Mohammed had to ‘get out of his
country, and from his kindred, and from his father’s house’, in order to fulfil
his mission. As long as he stayed in his hometown, Mecca, surrounded by the
people of his tribe, there was not that much impression by his revelations, as
is said “there is no prophet in his own town”. Only after he migrated (like
Abraham) from Mecca to Medinah (where he also apparently first heard about
Abraham), his mission and religion became established. Only after an exile of
eight years arrived Mohammad’s hour to return triumphantly to Mecca and to
establish there the sacred center of Islam, in conjunction with a special and
long-sanctified stone – the black stone that is embedded in the wall of the
shrine of the Ka’aba in Mecca. And thus, the black stone was added to the story
of Ya’aqov’s stones.
According to
the Moslem tradition and exegesis, Yishma’el-Ishmael lived at
Mecca, whereas Mohammad arrived in “The Night Journey” (Al-Isra’)
to Jerusalem. This way, there was opened an additional axis that leads to
Jerusalem. Ya’aqov erected his stone pillars at Bet-El and the Gile’ad on the
line that leads from Jerusalem to the house of Nahor at Haran,
whereas Mohammad opened the Mecca-Jerusalem axis, which is of immense importance
for our times. The Biblical narrative that leads to the setting and renewal of
the Temple cannot be realized without including in the consideration the
Mecca-Jerusalem axis, as marking the essence of the relationship between
Judaism and Islam.
The first
Temple was destroyed by enemies from Babel in the East, who arrived by the
northern route that was marked by Ya’aqov (Out of the North the evil shall
break forth” Jeremiah 1:14). The armies
of Rome, who also arrived via Syria in the north, destroyed the Second Temple.
It is possible to show that the turns over the generations of the relations of
Ya’aqov and Esav opened the East (Jerusalem) – West (Rome) axis as the main
axis for the relationship of Judaism and Christianity. Any plan for a “Third
Temple” will have to express these axes, in order to give meaning to the
symbolic relationship between Israel and Judaism to Christianity and to Islam,
and the amelioration and perfection of these relationships in the new Temple.
Part
II – Ya’aqov in Haran,
and the Moving of the Stone off the Well
The Stone
upon the Well
At Bet-El did
Ya’aqov set up a stone, and at Haran Ya’aqov pulled out and removed the
stone that was placed upon the well’s mouth. It is hard to know which stone was
larger: the monolith, which must have been at least as high as a man’s stature,
or the stone upon the well’s mouth at Haran. This stone is mentioned
three-four times: “and a great stone was upon the well’s mouth”, “and there
were all the flocks gathered, and they rolled the stone from the well’s mouth…
and put the stone back upon the well’s mouth in its place” (29:2-3), “We cannot, until all the flocks are gathered
together, and till they roll the stone from the well’s mouth” (29:8).
Ya’aqov
arrived, charged with immense energies that were gathered within him since that
pillar that he had placed at Bet-El, and he discharged them by rolling the
stone upon the well’s mouth at Haran. The name “Haran” is an
expression of dryness (like “Garon nihar” – dried throat), but
Ya’aqov, as a token of what is to come, opened the apertures of her land.
Compared with the pillar at Bet-El, which symbolized the ladder between earth
and heaven; the stone at Haran blocked the passage between what is going
on the ground and the depths and the water stored in the earth.
The meeting with Rahel by the Mouth of the Well.
“And it came
to pass, when Ya’aqov saw Rahel the daughter of Lavan his mother’s
brother” (29:10), the Bible doubles the
words that show the affinity that was between them beforehand, in a manner that
recalls the doubling in the mention of “take now thy son, thy only son Yitzhaq,
whom thou lovest” (22:2). “And the sheep
of Lavan his mother’s brother” (29:10) –
also the sheep have an important part in the plot, which will increase along
with the development of the story. The act of valor was done to impress Rahel,
but it was done also for the sake of the sheep, to water them.
“That
Ya’aqov went near, and rolled the stone from the well’s mouth”
It used to require the combined strength of all the shepherds of Haran to roll the stone off the well’s mouth. But on the moment that Ya’aqov beheld Rahel, he turned into a strongman like Samson, and alone rolled the stone from the well’s mouth and watered the sheep, in order to impress her. The sages say that he did it easily, “like one who removes the cork from the bottle” (Midrash Raba for Ecclesiastes, section 9).
But this show
of valor was destined to lead him to a prolonged carrying of a yoke, for the
course of the next twenty years. The voluntary slavery in herding the sheep,
for the sake of Rahel, was the appropriate thing, as the name “Rahel”
literally means “an ewe”. Rivqah - the meaning of whose name is a heiffer – was
chosen because of her caring for Eliezer’s animals; Rahel would cause
Ya’aqov a long and important connection with sheep.
“And (he)
watered – vayashq – the flock of Lavan his mother’s brother. And Ya’aqov
kissed – vayishaq – Rahel, and raised his voice, and wept”.
Ya’aqov is the one who
introduced kisses into the world of the Patriarchs. The first kiss - Neshiqah
- mentione din the Bible is the kiss of Ya’aqov to his father, to Yitzhaq
– but that was a kiss stolen by cheating. Only after he watered – hishqah
– the sheep of Lavan, his mother’s brother, he could legitimately continue “and
he kissed – vayishaq – Rahel (his mother’s brother)”. To
the sheep he gave water, to the woman he drew up the flow of his heart. This
kiss made him an adult for the first time. Eventually, he would kiss his
brother Esav, after the crossing of Yaboq, and this would
complete his process of maturing and overcoming.
But soon
enough it was found that Rahel was entailed with Lavan, that according
to his mouth all will be decided – yishaq Davar.
Unlike
Eli’ezer, who arrived at the house of Laban with camels loaded with expensive
presents, Ya’aqov was the poor and needy nephew, who would become an exploited
serf at his father in law’s house. How would he avoid becoming the most
despised minor among Laban’s children? The answer was in his love to Rahel.
In the mighty contention with Laban for twenty years, his weakness and his
strength derive from this love.
The meeting by
the well, which is the means of watering and vivifying the sheep, symbolized
much of course: the well – which gives life – is the womb of the earth and is
also Rahel herself, the desired woman. Ya’aqov exited from “Be’er-Sheva”
– namely, “the Well of Seven”. According to the ARI’zl (sha’ar
hapsuqim for “vayetse”), Ya’aqov is “Yesod
(the 2nd Sefirah from bottom, corresponding to the human genitals)
of Abba (Father archetype/Partsuf) that is put into
the Yesodof Imma (Mother archetype/Partsuf)”.
This is explained in the sequel: “the Yesod of Imma is
feminine, it is upturned to become a well, carved and hollow, nside which
enters the said member, and therefore the female Yesod is always
called ‘Well’”. His meeting with Rahel is by the mouth of the well at Haran.
The amazing
earthly falling in love is, thus, the reflection of a cosmic event of erotic
nature.
“And it
came to pass, when Lavan heard the tidings of Ya’aqov his sister’s son, that he
ran to meet him”
Who was Lavan? We have
already met Lavan at Eli’ezer’s visit, where he ran to the well after he saw
the presents that his sister received from the anonymous visitor.
On the face of
it, Lavan is the punishment due for Ya’aqov, a measure for measure. Ya’aqov,
who cheated (aqav) his brother, found a still greater cheater to
contend with. It is easy to hate Lavan, but it seems as if the correction-Tikkun
of the scheming Ya’aqov was precisely through the arch-villain Lavan.
The Mekubalim found a clue that Lavan (meaning “White” in Hebrew)
represents the highest influence, “The Superior Whiteness” (Loven ha’Elyon),
which is too sublime for Ya’aqov’s mind, and which brings him to perform much
beyond just what his heart would have desired.
The white
color carries many meanings, which might be different in different cultures,
but are always significant and primary. In general, white and red are regarded
as signifying basic emotional conflict, and many national conflicts found their
expression in the contention of the white color and red color[3]. The book of the Zohar starts with “the stanza of the
Rose”, which compares the Spirit of Israel (Knesset Yisra’el) to
a rose: just as the rose has both white and red, so Knesset Yisra’el
has both the white of Mercy (Hesed) and the red of rigor (Gevurah).
The rose that
is Knesset Yisra’el has thirteen petal, these are the tribes of
Israel. Thre is a balancing of the qualities of the white and the red and their
derivatives. In the former parashah, we saw the contention of Ya’aqov
with Esav, the one who was characterized by the red color and was named after
it. In this parashah, we learn of the rectification of Ya’aqov through
contention with Lavan (namely “White”). In the late Kabbalah, the
White is symbol for the figure of Abba-Father ans the Red a
symbol for the figure of Imma-Mother.
The
psychological meaning of this is that through his contention with Lavan,
Ya’aqov strives with the Father Figure within himself. While that was Abraham
who had bound Yitzhaq, here it was Lavan who bound Ya’aqov and tied him
to the Merkavah – the “Chariot”/assembly of the Patriarchs.
Also the original
flock of Lavan was apparently almost all white, and the seed for change was in
just a few sheep with diverse patterns – streaked, speckled, spotted, or
grizzled.
At first it
seems that the meeting of Ya’aqov with his uncle was hearty, almost like his
meeting with Rahel his daughter: Lavan ran towards him, hugged and
kissed him, called him “my bone and my flesh” and “my brother” and seemed to be
concerned for his welfare, asking him to name his wages.
But may note
another thing about Lavan – he is referred by the Hebrew Bible as ha’Arami
– “the Aramite” – which gives a hint, associating him, through word game, with Rama’i
– a swindler.
“And Laban
had two daughters; the name of the elder was Leah, and the name of the younger
was Rahel” (29:16).
Le’ah was the
firstborn (bekhirah), but Rahel was the choice (behirah)
of Ya’aqov. Le’ah inherited the invisible “Supernal Whiteness” of her father.
She became the representative of Lavan in the house of Ya’aqov; whereas Rahel
was the Red, the emotional. Ya’aqov – who could not get along with his brother
Esav who was called “Edom” and characterized by the color Red (adom)
– sought his complement and restitution (Tikkun) in his wife,
that immediately at meeting her she filled him with intense feelings, symbolize3d
by Red.
“And Jacob
loved Rahel; and said, I will serve you seven years for Rahel
your younger daughter”
At this stage,
there were no negotiations yet. Ya’aqov enamoured and destitute Ya’aqov was
ready to offer anything. The crafty Lavan must have understood that he could
draw the deal more and more by cheating. After seven years he changed his wages
and stealthily brought him Le’ah. After this change was discovered, Lavan made
Ya’aqov work for additional seven years for Rahel.
Ya’aqov
received his punishment from Lavan, a measure for measure: he posed as his
brother and came to his blind father – who lived in darkness – to take the
coveted blessing for himself, whereas Le’ah came to him in the darkness, posing
as her sister. The initiative for Ya’aqov’s masquerading was his mother,
Rivqah, the initiator of Leah’s masquerading was her father, Lavan, Ya’aqov’s
mother’s brother.
But like Esav,
who nevertheless was also blessed, so was Ya’aqov who was detained from his
desire by cheating, destined to marry also the younger sister and also the
maids of both sisters. What was formed through this mighty contention of
sisters was the pattern of the Twelve Tribes, which the House of Yitzhaq
has not yet succeeded to realize.
“And he
went in also to Rahel, and he loved also Rahel more than Leah,
and served with him yet seven other years.
And when the Lord saw that Leah was hated, he opened her womb; but Rahel
was barren”.
Apparently,
Ya’aqov would have been content with one son from his beloved wife. He might
have done nothing even if his beloved wife had stayed barren. It was the
circumstances, the cunning of providence, which brought him to engage so much
in the first command given to Adam and his wife “be fruitful and multiply”.
Le’ah, the elder sister, knew that she was not loved by her husband, but knew
how to become “the mother of the sons”.
It was in fact
Lavan’s cunning, together with the sisters’ contention among them, that brought
to the realization of the divine plan about the pattern of Twelve.
The Contention of Le’ah and Rahel
In telling the
story of Ya’aqov, the Bible leaves its usual and reserved style, in order to
tell a passionate love story. The real heavy emotional drama, which is just
hinted at, but is easy to understand, is about what passed between the sisters
from the moment that Ya’aqov fell in love with Rahel. While Ya’aqov was
struggling with Lavan, whom he was serving, the sisters struggled over
Ya’aqov’s bed and the right to beget, and spurned no means to succeed where the
matriarchs that preceded them failed. More precisely, they learnt to make the
mental sacrifices necessary for the founding of Israel, the sacrifice in giving
the maid to their husbands in their place, a sacrifice that was also made by
Sarah, but she never really reconciled with it. The two sisters did it
wholeheartedly. “The Original Sin” of envy among brothers connected with
sacrificing property was first restituted among the matriarchs-sisters, that
while they did envy each other they made a mutual creation.
The birth of
the twelve happened in three stages, or “waves”, four sons in each stage.
First, Le’ah bore four sons, and at that stage the beloved Rahel
recognized her failure and complained before Ya’aqov.
“And when
Rahel saw that she bore Jacob no children, Rahel envied her
sister; and said to Ya’aqov, Give me children, or else I die. And Ya’aqov’s anger was kindled against
Rahel; and he said, Am I in God's place, who has withheld from you the
fruit of the womb? And she said, Behold my maid Bilhah, go in to her; and she
shall bear upon my knees, that I may also have children by her.” (30:1-3).
Through te
open competition that broke between the two sisters, both of them did as Sarah
had done, and gave their maids to their husband. In this protracted struggle
among the ladies, the boundaries between lady and maid got severed, and what
was not possible at Abraham’s with Sarah and Hagar, became possible at
Ya’aqov’s. As each one of the sisters went on and gave her maid to her husband,
she regarded the sons of the maid as an additio
8 When
the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he set apart the
sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the
people of Israel.n to her power. They accepted the sons of the maids as
their own sons. The contending sisters did in fact reconcile with each other,
complemented each other in building together the vessel that could contain the
Twelve Tribe of Israel as a model for redemptive agency.
Rahel
was the first. Through despairing of giving birth she agreed to be built from
Bil’hah: “Behold my maid Bilhah, go in to her; and she shall bear upon my
knees, that I may also have children by her.” This way were born Dan and
Naphtali, who have to do with Din-Judgement and Naftulim-wrestlings.
When Le’ah
realized that the race is on, but that she stopped conceiving, she too overcame
her natural urge and gave to Ya’aqov her own maid, Zilpah. From this union came
Gad and Asher, both signs of blessing and abundance.
At that stage,
the four tribes have already turned into eight. What has been gained can be
appreciated by geometrical analysis: with four rods[4] it is possible to form a square assembly, a form that
describes a surface, but it lacks volume and cannot contain “depth”. The
minimal 3 dimensional structure (or “vessel”-Kli) that can be
built of rods is of six rods (a Tetrahedron). With eight rods, it is possible
to build a square pyramid, and with twelve rods, it is possible to build a cube
(or an octahedron), which is a structure (namely a vessel) that can contain
much more blessing.
In order to
attain the perfection of the twelve and the cube, there came “the Mandrake
affair” and gave the last addition that included another four tribes, and
especially added – hoseph – the House of Yoseph.
The Case of the Mandrakes in the field
“And Reuben
went in the days of wheat harvest, and found mandrakes in the field, and
brought them to his mother Leah. Then Rahel said to Leah, Give me, I beg
you, of your son's mandrakes. And she said to her, Is it a small matter that
you have taken my husband? and would you take away my son's mandrakes also? And
Rahel said, Therefore he shall lie with you to night for your son's
mandrakes. And Ya’aqov came from the field in the evening, and Leah went out to
meet him, and said, You must come in to me; for I have hired you with my son's
mandrakes. And he lay with her that night. And God listened to Leah, and she
conceived, and bore Ya’aqov the fifth son.
The hectic
story of fertility at the tents of Ya’aqov tarries for a moment on the scene of
the mandrakes, in which the sisters repeat – in reverse – the scene of the
brothers Ya’aqov and Esav, who held negotiations concerning a potage and senior
birthrights. Esav sold the firstborn right, which is a long term proposition,
for the price of a momentary desire for a potage; Rahel sold one night
of pleasure with her husband, for the price of the mandrakes – a possible
remedy for her bareness and the continuation of her bloodline. The outcome of
these selling and buying is the birth of three additional children to Le’ah,
and a first son for Rahel.
The finding of
the mandrakes in the field opened anew the struggle that only came to a halt
when Le’ah, “the mother of the children”, gave birth to six, but also the
barren Rahel gained two sons. The finding of the mandrakes in the field
aroused in Rahel a renewed hope for a child from her own womb, and
reopened for Le’ah an entrance to the tent of Ya’aqov. What was there in those
mandrakes, that they returned the pungent smell of desire to the arid tents? In
the Bible, the mandrakes appear only once more – in the Song of Songs (7:14) – where it says: “The mandrakes give a fragrance, and
at our gates are all manner of fruits, new and old”. The mandrakes have both
fruit and a large root, shaped like a human body, and the belief is that the
roots of the mandrake and its fruit raise desire for fertility.
It was Re’uven
who found the mandrakes, and it is likely that this was apposite. The soul of
Re’uven has a quality related to the mandrake fruit, the arouser of passion.
This was the same Re’uven about whom it was said: “thou wentest up to thy
father’s bed; then thou didst defile it: he went up to my couch” (49:4), and in that same blessing-curse Ya’aqov regarded him
as “unstable as water”. In the system of the Kabbalah, Reuven is associated
with “The Water Element”. His natural course of ascent is that of passion =>
Love (Ahavah)=> Will (Yahav) => Being (YHWH
as “Name of HaWaYaH, in the combination of H-W-H- Y[5]
The finding of
the mandrakes is the first event that marks leadership among the brothers. The
fruit of passion that her son gave her, granted Le’ah a renewed access to
Ya’aqov’s bed, and a double fruit: the permission granted by Rahel was
apparently for one time. But the birth of two additional sons and of a daughter
shows that this could not have been a unique occasion. Re’uven brought here to
himself a leadership position which is associated with lovemaking, with love
and grace. Eventually, “the Flag of the Camp of Re’uven” will be associated
with southern sector of the camping of the twelve tribes around the tabernacle
(the South side is associated in the Kabbalah with Hesed-Grace
and Love).
Le’ah, from
her side, made a sacrifice. Yielding the mandrakes to her sister was in fact
her own symbolic redemption from infertility. It was precisely when she yielded
the symbol of fertility to her sister, she regained fertility for herself,
mated with Ya’aqov and immediately conceived and bore him another son.
The fertility
attribute of these mandrakes had thus its effect with both the sisters, and at
last, the womb of the barren Rahel opened and she gave birth to Yoseph.
The meaning here of this name “Yoseph” is expressly a double
meaning – both the taking away – Asifah – of her reproach (30:23), as well as the prayer for the future addition – yosiph
– by the Lord of another son (30:24). In
this sense, also the birth of Binyamin, years later, was
connected with the birth of Yoseph and the case of the mandrakes
that Rahel received from her elder sister.
The miracle of
the opening of Rahel’s womb was preceded, as we noted, by three births
by Le’ah. “And God hearkened to Le’ah, and she conceived, and bore Ya’aqov a
fifth son” (30:17), “And Le’ah conceived
again, and bore Ya’aqov a sixth son” (30:19).
And afterwards
she bore a daughter, and called her name Dinah. And God remembered Rahel,
and God hearkened to her, and opened her womb. And she conceived and bore a son,;
and said, God has taken away my reproach. And she called his name Yoseph; and
said, The Lord shall add to me another son” (30:21-24).
It was
specifically the birth of the one daughter, Dinah, which opened what was closed
and barred among the sisters. The birth of Dinah was a sign for the birth of
Yoseph, to God’s remembrance of Rahel and for opening her womb.
At that stage,
Yoseph was Rahel’s only son, and the other sons, the sons of Le’ah and
of the maids, were distanced from Yoseph by various degrees. In the next parashah
we shall see how the original contention and envy among the sisters passed to
the next generation and were translated to the scenes of contention and envy pf
Yoseph’s brothers to him.
Motherhood-Games and Leadership-Struggles in Israel.
The name of
this parashah is “vaYetse”, and its subject matter is the
realization (hotsa’ah lapo’al) of the plan to prepare the
pioneering-nation for a new humankind. The essential quality of this nation is
its being formed in the pattern of the twelve brother-tribes, to the mellowing
(Mituk, literally “sweetening) the envy and severe competition
among brothers since the times of Kayin-Cain and Hevel-Abel.
But as we have already observed in the struggles between brothers of this
lineage, between Yishma’el and Yitzhaq and especially between the twin
brothers Ya’aqov and Esav, the actual emergence of the twelve is taking place
through – and from – struggle.
The struggle
took place first between the sisters Rahel and Le’ah, and they boty
enlisted for their aid also the maids that they received from their father
Lavan. They were fighting over the inheritance and material possessions for
their sons, but were also fighting over the seniority in the future Nation of
Israel, the leadership in, and the kingdom over, it.
The parashah
tells of the strivings of the sisters, that bring to the establishment of
the camping of four wives that surround the father of the tribes and to
bringing to the world the twelve inheritors (the twelfth, Binyamin, would be
born later). In the following become clarified the three figures of candidates
for leadership among the twelve: Re’uven, Yehudah-Judah and
Yoseph, and there is also hinted the possibility for seniority of Dan from
among the sons of the maids (though the explanation of this seniority would
come only later, in the story of Shimshon-Samson in the Book of
Judges).
In the
striving between Le’ah and Rahel, the weapons were beauty and fertility.
The style of the struggle was dictated by the customs of that period, but the
emotions and their intensity are still meaningful today. With every son she
bore, the mother gained a credit point. The struggle against the sister - the
feminine version of the Biblical brothers-conflicts that were already examined
– was so strong, that it could overcome the potential struggle with the maid
who bears an inheritor. The mothers’ envy that poisoned the relations of Yitzhaq
and Yishma’el already does not flare up in the new vessel that was formed.
The parallel
for our times would be if each one of the parties that would fight over the
leadership of Israel (say, as example, “the Right” and “the Left”), would
enlist assisting tribes from among parties currently regarded as being outside
of the Israeli identity – possibly foreign workers from one hand and
Palestinians on the other hand. In this context, there would be a great
significance for the possibility of organizing the contemporary Israel as a
confederation of twelve tribes, which allows flexibility in apportioning
resources and civic rights to their members. (We shall discuss these issues
more in the “Conclusions” chapter).
The
Names of the Tribes and the Structure of their Covenant
Parashat va’Yetse
gives an account of the order of the
emergence – yetsi’ah la’Olam - of the tribes, and this order
hints at an order for the components of a larger whole. The emergence of the
tribes is, as noted, in three stages of four each.
In naming her
first four sons, Le’ah related them to the divine by basic attributes: Re’uben,
namely Re’u-Ben – “see a son” – through sight; Shim’on
through Shmi’ah – hearing; Levi through
accompaniment Livuy; and Yehudah through
thanking-confessing – hodayah-hoda’ah. The appropriate leadership
of Israel should be selected from these qualities – a Vision, as the Children
of Israel might have aquied at Sinai but did not; Hearing Shmi’ah,
which connotes discipline-Mishma’at; the work of the Levites in
clinging to God-Hitla’vut; or admssion-confession-Hoda’yah
which has to do with humility.
The first four
are the sons of Le’ah. An immediate and flowing divine grace brought about a
typical and whole Merkavah-assembly. The order of Reuven-Shim’on-Levi-Yehudah
is parallel to the structure of the Merkavah of the patriarchs –
Abraham-Yitzhaq-Ya’aqov-David – and they occupy in this assembly the
same relative positions of Right-Left-Back-Leading. They are placed at the top
part of the ladder that is being formed, building in fact from heaven
downwards. But the position of Yehudah would be determined through descent,
“And… Yehudah went down from his brothers, and turned in…” (Gen. 38:1), and he therefore also rules on the earthly plain and
leads it with a heavenly intelligence, which is transferred through the
structure of this “Israeli Merkavah”.
The Twelve Tribes as ordered in Ya’aqov’s Ladder and the Circle
In the
interpretation of the Zohar to parashat va’Yetse, and especially
from Saba deMishpatim (“Grand-daddy of Judgements” – see Appendix
B), the twelve tribes are arrayed in the pattern of a human figure as follows: Re’uven
corresponding with the Sefira of Hesed, Shim’on
with Din-Judgement – as two hands: right and left. Levi
with the Lev-heart and connects (accompanies-melave)
between them, and Yehudah as corresponding with the Sefirah of Malkhut,
which corresponds with the soles of the feet. Yisaskhar and Zevulun
are regarded as corresponding to the Sefirot of Netsah and
of Hod, whose symbol in the human figure is the two thighs: right
and left – all these are the sons of Le’ah. Yoseph and Binyamin, the sons of Rahel,
both correspond to the Sefirah of Yesod, and to the genitals, one
in the exterior, and one in the interior. The four sons of the maids Bilhah and
Zilpah are regarded as the joints of the two legs, upon which stands the human
stature[6]
and his ability to walk and to make an exit from the bloody mire that we
are all sinking into in this land.
But all these
(representing a somewhat hierarchical arrangement), apply to the first stage,
of the exit and of Parashat va’Yetse. In the next stage (that
starts with Parashat va’Yeshev – “sitting” or settling), the
twelve tribes aught to be arrayed according to their equitable settlement
pattern in their land, a situation that is represented ideally by the order of
the camping of the tribes around the Tabernacle[7],
and is the pattern of the New Jerusalem (as we have shown in several places
above).
This new stage
starts by an action of contraction – Tsimtsum – in which each
side yields a sacred precinct that becomes the common domain for all the tribes
and is maintained only by the Levites, those who accompany – mitlavim
– to serve in it. In practice, the domains of the tribes are shaped by the
geographic constraints of the Land of Israel, but even that arrangement echoes
the order of the tribes around the Tabernacle. From the vision of the prophet
Ezekiel we see that when the future Temple is considered, each tribe has its
exclusive gate to enter into the sacred domain of the multi-national New Israel
entity and a sufficient space to come to in order to celebrate its holidays in
Jerusalem.
The Tribes and their Meaning for the Future
The complex
relationships between Ya’aqov-Yisra’el and the four mothers of the tribes that
are described in Parashat va’Yetse mark for us nowadays possible
and reasonable ways for the formation of the future Tribes of Israel from the
“mixed multitudes” of the residents of the contemporary land of Israel (and
Palestine) and of those who come to the land with feelings of holiness. We
shall discuss this more in the Summary and Conclusions chapter, but following
are a few outline possibilities.
In our time,
there is in the land a majority that is build of Judah and his brothers, who
see themselves as “Jews” – even though only a minority among them agrees to the
definitions of Rabbinical Judaism. It is possible to differentiate from these
Jews and those who may want to convert to Judaism some half a dozen tribes.
Then there is the large Arab minority, which is in practice in the status of
“Sons f the Maids”, who regard themselves as “sons of Hagar” Yishmaelites, but
who are different from the rest of the Arabs in their connection to the Holy
Land and to Jerusalem. In addition to these two major groups, there are many
potential-Israelites, “sons of Yoseph” who want to be added – yaseph
– to Yisra’el-Israel. These may come from various kinds of
“Christian Zionists” (people with affinity to Jesus-Yeshu’a ben Yoseph).
The additional “mixed multitudes”, made mainly of foreign workers, would be
able to form a tribe by their identification, or join existing tribes.
It is possible
to find stories and lineage accounts that show that the new joiners to Israel
derive from “The Ten Lost Tribes” that were exiles, or even from among former
people of Judah-Judea who did not want to leave the land at any costs (this is
the true historic story of the majority of the currently so-called
“Palestinians”). Such lineage accounts are useful for raising the argument, but
the essential thing is the feeling of belonging and heartfelt identification
with Zion and Jerusalem, and the willingness to come into the covenant of the
New Israel.
What the inner
narrative of Genesis grants us is clues about the whole (holist-holy)
structure, which integrates all these tribes, and the processes by which they
are given birth – and rebirth.
The Spiritual Moves of Ya’aqov between Le’ah and Rahel
“Jacob’s
Ladder” (Sulam Ya’qov) symbolizes and represents, as noted, the
cosmic process of the interactions “between heaven and earth”, a space that
contains many worlds. “Jacob’s Ladder”, we also noted, is the full human
stature, that represents Ya’aqov and in fact each one of us. In the system of
symbols of the Kabbalah, Ya’aqov represents the Sefirah of Tif’eret
(also called Rahamim-Compassion), Rahel (the
earthly one, symbolized by the moon) represents the Sefirah of Malkhut,
that pertains to materializing and entering This World (manifest and sensate),
and Le’ah represents the Sefirah of Binah[8]
that belongs to Olam haNistar – the Hidden World. This
symbolism, which was introduced in the Zohar, was developed in the Lurianic
Kabbalah into the chief cosmic drama and detailed into very precise procedures.
Very tersely,
the relationships of Ya’aqov with the two sisters can be represented through
the ladder pattern of the human soul as consisting of three layers: Nefesh
(mundane Soul), Ru’ah (Spirit) and Neshamah
(Divine, Eternal Soul). Ya’aqov-Yisra’el is the level of Ru’ah,
which takes pains between preferring relating with the Nefesh or
relating with the Neshamah. Such simplified model can be translated
to many of the personality theories prevalent in psychology; for example the TA
model of Eric Berne of the trinity of “Parent, Adult, Child” (which derives
from the Trinitarian model of Freud of “Id, Ego, Super-Ego”). From this model
it can be seen that Ya’aqov’s spiritual movements between Rahel and
Le’ah are a representation of the spiritual maturation of Ya’aqov – as of any
person. In the terms of the Kabbalah, the ascent of the ladder from the bottom
up, which is the Ascent of Man, is called “The Raising of Ma’N”
(acronym for Mayim Nuqbin – “Feminine Waters”), whereas the
drawing down of the Divine Vitality (Hayut), such as seen
by the angels descending from heaven, is the divinization of Man.
The
relationships of Ya’aqov with his two wives are represented in the Lurianic
Kabbalah as movements in the spiritual ladder of the Sefirot and
the Partsufim. Positioned upon the main ladder of the Sefirot,
Ya’aqov hangs behind the Sefirah of Tif’eret that is
differentiated into the configuration of Partsuf Ze’er Anpim
(“The Small Face of God”), where Le’ah faces him on the level that corresponds
to from his chest up, whereas Rahel faces him on the level that
corresponds to from his chest down.
The Negotiations of Ya’aqov and Lavan.
After the
birth of Yoseph, the son of the beloved wife Rahel, Ya’aqov’s affinity
to the earth strengthened, and he decided to return to his land and his
father’s house. At this stage, he was already able to negotiate with Lavan.
Both of them were suspicious and did not trust each other, and therefore
Ya’aqov suggested a method of proving that he would not steal sheep from Lavan.
He would select the sheep that have varius marks on their fur, “So shall my
righteousness answer for me in time to come, when thou shalt come to see my hire
before thy face: every one that is not speckled and spotted among the goats,
and brown among the sheep, that shall be counted stolen with me” (30:33).
In this manner
starts a long and twisted story, which is repeated and recounted in many
details, and recalls the long conversation of Abraham’s slave about the camels.
The contention of Ya’aqov and Lavan takes place over the cattle, and we – who
have hardly learnt about the characteristics of Ya’aqov’s wives – come to
repeat and learn in minute details all about the shapes of the spots of the
beasts. Only at the last round we learn the secret, that Ya’aqov had dreamt a
prophetic dream from “I Am the God of Bet-El, where thou didst anoint a pillar,
and where thou didst vow a vow to me” (31:13), a dream that was dedicated, of all things, to the breeding of the
cattle (and to the exit from Haran to his homeland). This
apparently-marginal mention hints at something that upturns all the order of
the worlds that we have learnt up to now.
In the course
of the narrative, there are given many and various descriptions to the spots on
the animals’ furs, but in the recounting of the dream there is given the
formula “streaked, speckled and grizzled” (Aqudim, Nekudim u’Berudim).
In the course of the generations, the Jewish Biblical exegesis came to
attribute to this detail most profound secrets concerning the worlds that
preceded This World of ours. In the Lurianic Kabbalah we learn that this was
the order of cosmological development: “The World-Olam of the Aqudim,
Olam ha’Nekudim and Olam ha’Berudim. The first two worlds
were “worlds of Chaos” (Olamot Tohu), whereas the last is “The
World of Rectification” – Olam ha’Tikkun[9].
One may wonder
why should these cosmological secrets be hinted at in this very earthly context
of acquiring cattle. But it seems that the two dreams of Ya’aqov are in some
respects the same dream. In many cases that a contemporary person is taken by
the urge to prophecy (or “channel”), he (or more likely, she) is likely to have
visions about ancient, antediluvian, continents, such as “Atlantis” and
“Lemuria”, that disappeared under the waves in prehistoric times. We have
already seen that Ya’aqov was given a dream where he saw heavenly worlds. It
seems as if now, when his head was full of concerns of property and cattle, it
was not the heavens that opened to him, but the hidden strata below the earth
and the energies in them. The powers of fertility in the earth are connected,
it seems, to primordial and ancient powers, which are called in the Kabbalah Orot
ha’Tohu (“Lights of Chaos”) and they are connected in the divinity to
the emergence of “The Name of Be’N” (“Son”, of the gematric value (52) of the Miluy-“Filling”
of the Name of YHWH in the letters of Y’od H’eh W’aw H’eh) which is also called
Behema Raba (“The Great Beast” – as the word “Beast”-BeHeMaH
has the same gematria value of 52 as the word “Son”-BeN).
Within this complex world model, Ya’aqov-Yisra’el is the Universal Man who builds the World of Rectification, and he is found in mutual affinities both with “Le’ah”, who is the Sefirah of Binah and Partsuf Imma (“The Mother Archetype” as Le’ah is “The Mother of the Children – Em ha’Banim) that is the hidden and covert world, as well as with “Rahel” who is the Shekhinah, the Sefirah of Malkhut and Partsuf haNukba (The Feminine Face of God) which